skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531725acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Twitter ain't without frontiers: economic, social, and cultural boundaries in international communication

Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advent of Twitter and other lightweight social-networking services, one might think that it is easier than ever to maintain geographically dispersed, weaker social ties. By contrast, in this study we show that the international Twitter communication landscape is not only still largely predetermined by physical distance, but that it also depends on countries' social, economic, and cultural attributes. We describe a study of an international Twitter mention network of 13 million users across over 100 countries. We show that the Gravity Model, which hypothesizes that the flow between two areas is proportional to their masses (which we approximate using internet penetration) and inversely proportional to the distance between them, is correlated (r=0.68) with the international communication flow. Using this model, along with other social, economic, and cultural variables, we predict the communication volume at Adjusted R2 of $0.80$, with trade, language and racial intolerance especially impacting communication. We discuss the implications of these barriers to communication in the contexts of collaborative work, software design, and recommendation systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Vespignani, A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 11 (2004), 3747--3752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Beevolve. An exhaustive study of twitter users across the world. http://www.beevolve.com/twitter-statistics/, January 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Berggren, N., and Nilsson, T. Does economic freedom foster tolerance? Working Paper Series 918, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Borning, A., and Muller, M. Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2012), 1125--1134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hutchinson, W. K. Does ease of communication increase trade commonality of language and bilateral trade. Vanderbilt University Dept. of Economics Working Papers 0217, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brun, J.-F., Carrère, C., Guillaumont, P., and De Melo, J. Has distance died? evidence from a panel gravity model. The World Bank Economic Review 19, 1 (2005), 99--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cairncross, F. The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Harvard Business Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Duronto, P. M., and Nakayama, S. Japanese communication. avoidance, anxiety, and uncertainty during initial encounters. Journal of East Asian Affairs\ (2005), 22--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ess, C., and Sudweeks, F. On the edge: Cultural barriers and catalysts to it diffusion among remote and marginalized communities. New Media & Society 3, 3 (2001), 259--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Garcìa-Gavilanes, R., Quercia, D. and Jaimes, A. Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power. In Proceedings of the The 7th International AAAI Conference on WebLogs and Social Media (ICWSM) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelman, A., and Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models, 1 ed. Cambridge University Press, Dec. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gilbert, E., and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (2009) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology\ (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofstede, G. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values, vol. 5. Sage Publications, Incorporated, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., and Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software Of The Mind. McGraw-Hill USA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Huntington, S. P. The clash of civilizations? Foreign affairs (1993), 22--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, W.-S., Wang, F., and Stanley, H. E. Gravity Model in the Korean Highway. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 81, 4 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J. The future of crowd work. In ACM Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work(CSCW) (2013), 1301--1318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kleinberg, J. The convergence of social and technological networks. Communications of the ACM 51, 11 (2008), 66--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Krings, G., Calabrese, F., Ratti, C., and Blondel, V. D. Urban gravity: a model for inter-city telecommunication flows. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment\ (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauterbach, D., Truong, H., Shah, T., and Adamic, L. Surfing a web of trust: Reputation and reciprocity on couchsurfing. com. In the 12th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. (CSE) (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lee, K., Eoff, B., and Caverlee, J. Seven months with the devils: A long-term study of content polluters on twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Leskovec, J., and Horvitz, E. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of the ACM 17th international conference on World Wide Web, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Meier, J. P. Do "Liberation Technologies" Change the Balance of Power Between Repressive States and Civil Society? PhD thesis, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mok, D., Wellman, B., and Carrasco, J. Does distance matter in the age of the internet? Urban Studies 47, 13 (2010), 2747--2783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nardi, B. A., Vatrapu, R. K., and Clemmensen, T. Comparative informatics. Interactions 18, 2 (2011), 28--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction (2000), 139--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Scellato, S., Mascolo, C., Musolesi, M., and Latora, V. Distance matters: geo-social metrics for online social networks. In the Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Online Social Networks (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Scellato, S., Noulas, A., Lambiotte, R., and Mascolo, C. Socio-spatial properties of online location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, C., Quercia, D., and Capra, L. Anti-gravity underground? In the 2nd Workshop on Pervasive Urban Applications (PURBA) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, C., Quercia, D., and Capra, L. Finger on the pulse: identifying deprivation using transit flow analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM 16th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. State, B., Park, P., Weber, I., Mejova, Y., and Macy, M. The mesh of civilizations and international email flows. Tech. Rep. No. arXiv: 1303.0045, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Takhteyev, Y. Coding Places: Software Practice in a South American City. The MIT Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., and Wellman, B. Geography of twitter networks. Social Networks 34, 1 (2012), 73--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Thomas, K., Grier, C., Song, D., and Paxson, V. Suspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of twitter spam. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference ( 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Travers, J., and Milgram, S. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry (1969), 425--443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. University, T. P. S. Stat 501 - regression methods, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Venkataraman, M., Subbalakshmi, K. P., and Chandramouli, R. Measuring and quantifying the silent majority on the internet. In the 35th IEEE Sarnoff Symposium (SARNOFF) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wang, B., Wang, C., Bu, J., Chen, C., Zhang, W. V., Cai, D., and He, X. Whom to mention: expand the diffusion of tweets by @ recommendation on micro-blogging systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K. The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. Penguin Books, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zipf, G. K. The p 1 p 2/d hypothesis: on the intercity movement of persons. American sociological review 11, 6 (1946).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Twitter ain't without frontiers: economic, social, and cultural boundaries in international communication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
        February 2014
        1600 pages
        ISBN:9781450325400
        DOI:10.1145/2531602

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 February 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader