1932

Abstract

This review covers research on attitudes and attitude change published between 2010 and 2017. We characterize this period as one of significant progress toward an understanding of how attitudes form and change in three critical contexts. The first context is the person, as attitudes change in connection to values, general goals, language, emotions, and human development. The second context is social relationships, which link attitude change to the communicator of persuasive messages, social media, and culture. The third context is sociohistorical and highlights the influence of unique events, including sociopolitical, economic, and climatic occurrences. In conclusion, many important recent findings reflect the fact that holism, with a focus on situating attitudes within their personal, social, and historical contexts, has become the zeitgeist of attitude research during this period.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
2018-01-04
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/69/1/annurev-psych-122216-011911.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. 1986. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22:5453–74 [Google Scholar]
  2. Albarracín D, Handley IM. 2011. The time for doing is not the time for change: effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:6983–98 [Google Scholar]
  3. Albarracín D, Handley IM, Noguchi K, McCulloch KC, Li H. et al. 2008. Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: a model of general action and inaction goals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:3510–23 [Google Scholar]
  4. Albarracin D, Kumkale GT, Del Vento PP. 2017. How people can become persuaded by weak messages presented by credible communicators: Not all sleeper effects are created equal. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 68:171–80 [Google Scholar]
  5. Albarracin D, Zanna MP, Johnson BT, Kumkale GT. 2005. Attitudes: introduction and scope. The Handbook of Attitudes D Albarracin, BT Johnson, MP Zanna 3–19 Hove, UK: Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Allport GW. 1935. Attitudes. A Handbook of Social Psychology C Murchison 798–844 Worcester, MA: Clark Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Barden J, Tormala ZL. 2014. Elaboration and attitude strength: the new meta-cognitive perspective. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 8:117–29 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger J. 2014. Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: a review and directions for future research. J. Consum. Psychol. 24:4586–607 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blankenship KL, Wegener DT, Murray RA. 2012. Circumventing resistance: using values to indirectly change attitudes. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 103:4606–21 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blankenship KL, Wegener DT, Murray RA. 2015. Values, inter-attitudinal structure, and attitude change: Value accessibility can increase a related attitude's resistance to change. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:121739–50 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boer D, Fischer R. 2013. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychol. Bull. 139:51113–47 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohner G, Dickel N. 2011. Attitudes and attitude change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:391–417 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonneville-Roussy A, Rentfrow PJ, Xu MK, Potter J. 2013. Music through the ages: trends in musical engagement and preferences from adolescence through middle adulthood. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 105:4703–17 [Google Scholar]
  14. Briley D, Wyer RS, Li E. 2014. A dynamic view of cultural influence: a review. J. Consum. Psychol. 24:4557–71 [Google Scholar]
  15. Calanchini J, Sherman JW. 2013. Implicit attitudes reflect associative, non-associative, and non-attitudinal processes. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 7:9654–67 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cameron CD, Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Payne BK. 2012. Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: a meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 16:4330–50 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carrera P, Muñoz D, Caballero A, Fernández I, Albarracín D. 2012. The present projects past behavior into the future while the past projects attitudes into the future: how verb tense moderates predictors of drinking intentions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:51196–200 [Google Scholar]
  18. Carstensen LL. 2006. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science 312:1913–16 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan MS, Jones CR, Albarracin D. 2017. Countering false beliefs: an analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation. The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication KH Jamieson, D Kahan, DA Scheufele 331–39 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaplin LN, John DR. 2010. Interpersonal influences on adolescent materialism: a new look at the role of parents and peers. J. Consum. Psychol. 20:2176–84 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chiu C-Y, Gelfand MJ, Yamagishi T, Shteynberg G, Wan C. 2010. Intersubjective culture: the role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5:4482–93 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chu SC, Kim Y. 2011. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. Int. J. Advert. 30:147–75 [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark JK, Evans AT. 2014. Source credibility and persuasion: the role of message position in self-validation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40:81024–36 [Google Scholar]
  24. Clark JK, Wegener DT, Sawicki V, Petty RE, Briñol P. 2013. Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39:121571–84 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clore GL, Schnall S. 2005. The influence of affect on attitude. The Handbook of Attitudes D Albarracin, BT Johnson, MP Zanna 437–90 Hove, UK: Psychol. Press
  26. de Klepper M, Sleebos E, van de Bunt G, Agneessens F. 2010. Similarity in friendship networks: selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Soc. Netw. 32:182–90 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dolcos S, Albarracin D. 2014. The inner speech of behavioral regulation: intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44:6636–42 [Google Scholar]
  28. Donnelly K, Twenge JM, Clark MA, Shaikh SK, Beiler-May A, Carter NT. 2016. Attitudes toward women's work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychol. Women Q. 40:1361684315590774 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dubois D, Rucker DD, Galinsky AD. 2016. Dynamics of communicator and audience power: the persuasiveness of competence versus warmth. J. Consum. Res. 43:168–85 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Fenton O, Martin K. 2014. Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Mem. Cogn. 42:2292–304 [Google Scholar]
  31. Effron DA, Miller DT. 2012. How the moralization of issues grants social legitimacy to act on one's attitudes. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:5690–701 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ehret PJ, Monroe BM, Read SJ. 2015. Modeling the dynamics of evaluation: a multilevel neural network implementation of the iterative reprocessing model. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 19:2148–76 [Google Scholar]
  33. Eom K, Kim HS, Sherman DK, Ishii K. 2016. Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychol. Sci. 27:101–9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA, Judge TA. 2015. The dispositional basis of attitudes: a replication and extension of Hepler and Albarracín 2013. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 108:5e1–15 [Google Scholar]
  35. Feinberg M, Willer R. 2013. The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 24:156–62 [Google Scholar]
  36. Feldman G, Albarracín D. 2016. Norm theory and the action-effect: the role of social norms in regret following action and inaction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69:111–20 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fraley RC, Griffin BN, Belsky J, Roisman GI. 2012. Developmental antecedents of political ideology: a longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychol. Sci. 23:111425–31 [Google Scholar]
  38. Galdi S, Gawronski B, Arcuri L, Friese M. 2012. Selective exposure in decided and undecided individuals. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:5559–69 [Google Scholar]
  39. Garnett BR, Buelow R, Franko DL, Becker C, Rodgers RF, Austin SB. 2014. The importance of campaign saliency as a predictor of attitude and behavior change: a pilot evaluation of social marketing campaign Fat Talk Free Week. Health Commun 29:10984–95 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J. et al. 2011. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332:60331100–4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR, Nosek BA. 2015. Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 108:4553–61 [Google Scholar]
  42. Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR. 2009. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:117–41 [Google Scholar]
  43. Halperin E, Porat R, Tamir M, Gross JJ. 2013. Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychol. Sci. 24:1106–11 [Google Scholar]
  44. Han S-P, Shavitt S. 1994. Persuasion and culture: advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30:4326–50 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hart W, Albarracín D, Eagly AH, Brechan I, Lindberg MJ, Merrill L. 2009. Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol. Bull. 135:4555–88 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hepler J, Albarracín D. 2013. Attitudes without objects: evidence for a dispositional attitude, its measurement, and its consequences. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 104:61060–76 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hepler J, Albarracin D. 2014. Liking more means doing more: Dispositional attitudes predict patterns of general action. Soc. Psychol. 45:5391–98 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hong J, Chang HH. 2015. “I” follow my heart and “we” rely on reasons: the impact of self-construal on reliance on feelings versus reasons in decision making. J. Consum. Res. 41:April1392–411 [Google Scholar]
  49. Howe LC, Krosnick JA. 2017. Attitude strength. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68:327–51 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hunt CV, Kim A, Borgida E, Chaiken S. 2010. Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: the role of temporal perspective. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:61155–58 [Google Scholar]
  51. Jamieson KH, Hardy BW. 2014. Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends in a polarized political environment. PNAS 111:Suppl.13598–605 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jia L, Smith ER. 2013. Distance makes the metaphor grow stronger: a psychological distance model of metaphor use. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49:3492–97 [Google Scholar]
  53. Johnson TP, Shavitt S, Holbrook AL. 2011. Survey response styles across cultures. Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology D Matsumoto, F van de Vijver 130–75 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Jost JT, Banaji MR. 1994. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 33:11–27 [Google Scholar]
  55. Jung CG. 1923. Psychological Types, or the Psychology of Individuation Zürich: Rascher Verl.
  56. Kalinoski ZT, Steele-Johnson D, Peyton EJ, Leas KA, Steinke J, Bowling NA. 2013. A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 34:81076–104 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim HS, Sherman DK. 2007. “Express yourself”: culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92:11–11 [Google Scholar]
  58. Konrath SH, O'Brien EH, Hsing C. 2011. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15:2180–98 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kross E, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Park J, Burson A, Dougherty A. et al. 2014. Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: How you do it matters. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 106:2304–24 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kruglanski AW, Gigerenzer G. 2011. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychol. Rev. 118:197–109 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kumkale GT, Albarracín D. 2004. The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 130:1143–72 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lai J, He P, Chou H-M, Zhou L. 2013. Impact of national culture on online consumer review behavior. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 7:1109–15 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lalwani AK, Shavitt S. 2013. You get what you pay for? Self-construal influences price-quality judgments. J. Consum. Res. 40:2255–67 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lambert AJ, Scherer LD, Schott JP, Olson KR, Andrews RK. et al. 2010. Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: an integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 98:6886–903 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ledgerwood A, Trope Y, Chaiken S. 2010. Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 99:132–51 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lemmer G, Wagner U. 2015. Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 45:2152–68 [Google Scholar]
  67. Levy SR, Freitas AL, Mendoza-Denton R, Kugelmass H, Rosenthal L. 2010. When sociopolitical events strike cultural beliefs: divergent impact of Hurricane Katrina on African Americans’ and European Americans’ endorsement of the Protestant work ethic. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32:3207–16 [Google Scholar]
  68. Li R, Gordon S, Gelfand MJ. 2017. Tightness-looseness: a new framework to understand consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 27:3377–91 [Google Scholar]
  69. Liberman N, Trope Y. 1998. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 75:15–18 [Google Scholar]
  70. Mares ML, Sun Y. 2010. The multiple meanings of age for television content preferences. Hum. Commun. Res. 36:3372–96 [Google Scholar]
  71. Markus HR, Conner A. 2013. Clash!: How to Thrive in a Multicultural World New York: Plume
  72. McCulloch KC, Li H, Hong S, Albarracin D. 2012. Naïve definitions of action and inaction: the continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 42:2227–34 [Google Scholar]
  73. Meissner F, Rothermund K. 2013. Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the implicit association test: the ReAL model for the IAT. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 104:145–69 [Google Scholar]
  74. Mercier H. 2016. The argumentative theory: predictions and empirical evidence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20:9689–700 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mercier H, Sperber D. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav. Brain Sci. 34:257–111 [Google Scholar]
  76. Miche M, Elsässer VC, Schilling OK, Wahl H-W. 2014. Attitude toward own aging in midlife and early old age over a 12-year period: examination of measurement equivalence and developmental trajectories. Psychol. Aging 29:3588–600 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mikels JA, Shuster MM, Thai ST, Smith-Ray R, Waugh CE. et al. 2016. Messages that matter: age differences in affective responses to framed health messages. Psychol. Aging 31:4409–14 [Google Scholar]
  78. Miles E, Crisp RJ. 2014. A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 17:13–26 [Google Scholar]
  79. Milfont TL, Duckitt J, Wagner C. 2010. A cross-cultural test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 40:112791–813 [Google Scholar]
  80. Miller DT, Effron DA. 2010. Psychological license: when it is needed and how it functions. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43:C115–55 [Google Scholar]
  81. Miller JG, Das R, Chakravarthy S. 2011. Culture and the role of choice in agency. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 101:146–61 [Google Scholar]
  82. Milojev P, Greaves L, Osborne D, Sibley CG. 2015. Stability and change in political conservatism following the global financial crisis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:1127–39 [Google Scholar]
  83. Monga AB, John DR. 2010. What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. J. Mark. 74:380–92 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mynhardt JC. 2013. Intergroup attitude change in South Africa: a thirty-seven year longitudinal study. J. Psychol. Afr. 23:4549–60 [Google Scholar]
  85. Ng AH, Hynie M. 2014. Cultural differences in indecisiveness: the role of naïve dialecticism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 70:45–50 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ng AH, Hynie M, MacDonald TK. 2012. Culture moderates the pliability of ambivalent attitudes. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 43:81313–24 [Google Scholar]
  87. Ng T, Feldman D. 2010. The relationships of age with job attitudes: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 63:3677–718 [Google Scholar]
  88. Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol. Rev. 108:2291–310 [Google Scholar]
  89. Notthoff N, Carstensen LL. 2014. Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults. Psychol. Aging 29:2329–41 [Google Scholar]
  90. Nteta TM, Greenlee JS. 2013. A change is gonna come: generational membership and White racial attitudes in the 21st century. Polit. Psychol. 34:6877–97 [Google Scholar]
  91. Orth U, Robins RW, Widaman KF. 2012. Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:61271–88 [Google Scholar]
  92. Orth U, Trzesniewski KH, Robins RW. 2010. Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: a cohort-sequential longitudinal study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 98:4645–58 [Google Scholar]
  93. Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE. 2015. Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 108:4562–71 [Google Scholar]
  94. Oyamot CM, Fisher EL, Deason G, Borgida E. 2012. Attitudes toward immigrants: the interactive role of the authoritarian predisposition, social norms, and humanitarian values. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:197–105 [Google Scholar]
  95. Park LE, Young AF, Troisi JD, Pinkus RT. 2011. Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women's attitudes toward math and science. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37:91259–73 [Google Scholar]
  96. Pierro A, Mannetti L, Kruglanski AW, Klein K, Orehek E. 2012. Persistence of attitude change and attitude-behavior correspondence based on extensive processing of source information. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 42:1103–11 [Google Scholar]
  97. Pietri ES, Fazio RH, Shook NJ. 2013. Weighting positive versus negative: the fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. J. Personal. 81:2196–208 [Google Scholar]
  98. Pillaud V, Cavazza N, Butera F. 2013. The social value of being ambivalent: self-presentational concerns in the expression of attitudinal ambivalence. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39:91139–51 [Google Scholar]
  99. Ranney MA, Clark D. 2016. Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Top. Cogn. Sci. 8:149–75 [Google Scholar]
  100. Reed AE, Chan L, Mikels JA. 2014. Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol. Aging 29:11–15 [Google Scholar]
  101. Rentfrow PJ, Goldberg LR, Levitin DJ. 2011. The structure of musical preferences: a five-factor model. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:61139–57 [Google Scholar]
  102. Riemer H, Shavitt S, Koo M, Markus HR. 2014. Preferences don't have to be personal: expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychol. Rev. 121:4619–48 [Google Scholar]
  103. Rocklage MD, Fazio RH. 2014. Individual differences in valence weighting: when, how, and why they matter. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 50:1144–57 [Google Scholar]
  104. Roos LE, Lebrecht S, Tanaka JW, Tarr MJ. 2013. Can singular examples change implicit attitudes in the real-world?. Front. Psychol. 4:Sept.1–14 [Google Scholar]
  105. Rudman LA, McLean MC, Bunzl M. 2013. When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for Green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 24:112290–96 [Google Scholar]
  106. Savani K, Morris MW, Naidu NVR. 2012. Deference in Indians’ decision making: introjected goals or injunctive norms?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:4685–99 [Google Scholar]
  107. Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N. 2011. “Global warming” or “climate change”?. Public Opin. Q. 75:1115–24 [Google Scholar]
  108. Schwartz SH, Cieciuch J, Vecchione M, Davidov E, Fischer R. et al. 2012. Refining the theory of basic individual values. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 103:4663–88 [Google Scholar]
  109. Shavitt S, Cho H. 2016. Culture and consumer behavior: the role of horizontal and vertical cultural factors. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 8:149–54 [Google Scholar]
  110. Shavitt S, Cho H, Barnes A. 2017. Culture and Consumer Behavior. Handbook of Cultural Psychology S Kitayama, D Cohen New York: Guilford Press. , 2nd ed.. In press [Google Scholar]
  111. Shavitt S, Johnson TP, Zhang J. 2011. Horizontal and vertical cultural differences in the content of advertising appeals. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 23:297–310 [Google Scholar]
  112. Sheets P, Domke DS, Greenwald AG. 2011. God and country: the partisan psychology of the presidency, religion, and nation. Polit. Psychol. 32:3459–84 [Google Scholar]
  113. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22:111359–66 [Google Scholar]
  114. Spencer-Rodgers J, Williams MJ, Peng K. 2010. Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: a decade of empirical research. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14:3296–312 [Google Scholar]
  115. Stanley DA, Sokol-Hessner P, Banaji MR, Phelps EA. 2011. Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. PNAS 108:197710–15 [Google Scholar]
  116. Steinmetz H, Knappstein M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P, Kabst R. 2016. How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Z. Psychol. 224:3216–233 [Google Scholar]
  117. Stout JG, Dasgupta N, Hunsinger M, McManus MA. 2011. STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:2255–70 [Google Scholar]
  118. Struthers A, Wang M. 2016. Buzz agents in a teen-driven social marketing campaign: Positive campaign attitude leads to positive changes in health outcomes. Soc. Mark. Q. 22:3218–35 [Google Scholar]
  119. Tannenbaum MB, Hepler J, Zimmerman RS, Saul L, Jacobs S. et al. 2015. Appealing to fear: a meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychiatr. Bull. 141:61178–204 [Google Scholar]
  120. Thibodeau PH, Crow L, Flusberg SJ. 2017. The metaphor police: a case study of the role of metaphor in explanation. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24:51375–86 [Google Scholar]
  121. Thomas WI, Znaniecki F. 1918–1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America Boston: Gorham Press
  122. Torelli CJ, Özsomer A, Carvalho SW, Keh HT, Maehle N. 2012. Brand concepts as representations of human values: Do cultural congruity and compatibility between values matter. J. Mark. 76:July92–108 [Google Scholar]
  123. Torelli CJ, Shavitt S. 2010. Culture and concepts of power. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 99:4703–23 [Google Scholar]
  124. Torelli CJ, Shavitt S, Cho YI, Holbrook AL, Johnson TP, Weiner S. 2015. Justice or compassion? Cultural differences in power norms affect consumer satisfaction with power-holders. Int. Mark. Rev. 324:3279–306 [Google Scholar]
  125. Triandis HC, Gelfand MJ. 1998. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:1118–28 [Google Scholar]
  126. Trzesniewski KH, Donnellan MB. 2010. Rethinking “Generation Me”: a study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5:158–75 [Google Scholar]
  127. Twenge JM. 2014. Generation Me—Revised and Updated: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled—and More Miserable than Ever Before New York: Atria Books
  128. Twenge JM, Honeycutt N, Prislin R, Sherman RA. 2016a. More polarized but more Independent: political party identification and ideological self-categorization among US adults, college students, and late adolescents, 1970–2015. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42:101364–83 [Google Scholar]
  129. Twenge JM, Kasser T. 2013. Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976–2007: associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39:7883–97 [Google Scholar]
  130. Twenge JM, Sherman RA, Exline JJ, Grubbs JB. 2016b. Declines in American adults’ religious participation and beliefs, 1972–2014. SAGE Open 6:12158244016638133 [Google Scholar]
  131. Tyson M, Covey J, Rosenthal HES. 2014. Theory of planned behavior interventions for reducing heterosexual risk behaviors: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 33:121454–67 [Google Scholar]
  132. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Walther JB. 2016. Media effects: theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67:1315–38 [Google Scholar]
  133. van Bavel JJ, Xiao YJ, Cunningham WA. 2012. Evaluation is a dynamic process: moving beyond dual system models. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass. 6:438–54 [Google Scholar]
  134. von Salisch M, Vogelgesang J, Kristen A, Oppl C. 2011. Preference for violent electronic games and aggressive behavior among children: the beginning of the downward spiral. Media Psychol 14:3233–58 [Google Scholar]
  135. Wakslak C, Liberman N, Trope Y. 2007. Construal levels and psychological distance: effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 17:283–95 [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang Q. 2013. Chinese socialization and emotion talk between mothers and children in native and immigrant Chinese families. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 4:3185–92 [Google Scholar]
  137. Weaver JR, Bosson JK. 2011. I feel like I know you: sharing negative attitudes of others promotes feelings of familiarity. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37:4481–91 [Google Scholar]
  138. Wegener DT, Petty RE, Blankenship KL, Detweiler-Bedell B. 2010. Elaboration and numerical anchoring: implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. J. Consum. Psychol. 20:15–16 [Google Scholar]
  139. Welch S, Sigelman L. 2011. The “Obama Effect” and White racial attitudes. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 634:Feb.207–20 [Google Scholar]
  140. Wolsko C, Ariceaga H, Seiden J. 2016. Red, white, and blue enough to be green: effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. 657–19
  141. Yang H, Stamatogiannakis A, Chattopadhyay A. 2015. Pursuing attainment versus maintenance goals: the interplay of self-construal and goal type on consumer motivation. J. Consum. Res. 42:193–108 [Google Scholar]
  142. Yang Y, Land KC. 2013. Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: New Models, Methods, and Empirical Applications Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
  143. Zabel KL, Biermeier-Hanson BBJ, Baltes BB, Early BJ, Shepard A. 2016. Generational differences in work ethic: fact or fiction?. J. Bus. Psychol. 32:3301–15 [Google Scholar]
  144. Zell E, Su R, Li H, Ho M-HR, Hong S. et al. 2012a. Cultural differences in attitudes toward action and inaction: the role of dialecticism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4:5521–28 [Google Scholar]
  145. Zell E, Warriner AB, Albarracín D. 2012b. Splitting of the mind: when the you I talk to is me and needs commands. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3:5549–55 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error