Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Work, Leisure, and Support Groups: An Examination of the Ways Women with Infertility Respond to Pronatalist Ideology

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pronatalism embodies the belief that a woman's social value is linked to her production of biological children (C. Morell, 2000). Conceiving and bearing children is literally impossible, however, for some of the 5 million women in the United States who struggle with infertility. Women negotiate their experiences with infertility within a pronatalist society, yet their experiences therein have been given little attention. Thus, the purpose of this research was to explore women's lived experiences with infertility in a pronatalist ideology. Active interviews with 32 participants who had experienced infertility revealed that the women were aware of a pronatalist ideology, which was manifested through insensitive comments or questions and unsolicited advice. The women responded by immersing themselves in their work, leisure activities/experiences, or support groups. The findings illustrate how pronatalist ideology is manifest in social interactions, but they also suggest how it may be resisted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambert, A., Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D. F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 879–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, D. E. (2000). Defining infertility. Public Health Reports, 115, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Women's Health Book Collective. Our bodies, ourselves. (3rd ed.). (1998). New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniluk, J. (1997). Helping patients cope with infertility. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40, 661–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, S. (1998). Naked truths: Toward a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. (1992). Against the grain: Lives of women without children. IRIS: A Journal About Women, 2, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Woodward, S., & Hebron, E. (1990). Women's leisure: What leisure? Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. (1998). ‘Women doing friendship’: An analysis of women's leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment, and resistance. Leisure Studies, 17, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greil, A. L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, K. A. (1999). Infertility treatment: An argument for mandated coverage. Journal of Health Law, 32(3), 445–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki, Y., & Mannell, R. C. (2000). Hierarchical dimensions of leisure stress coping. Leisure Sciences, 22, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordon, C., & Revenson, T. A. (1999). Gender differences in coping with infertility: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 341–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. J. (1992). Feminist facts: Interview strategies and political subjects in ethnography. Communication Theory, 2, 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, C. (2000). Saying no: Women's experiences with reproductive refusal. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: Toward a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S. M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: Women's leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, A. (2004). Psychological issues and interventions with infertile patients. Women and Therapy, 27, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, M., & Weatherall, A. (2000). Motherhood and infertility: Viewing motherhood through the lens of infertility. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (2001). (Misconceptions). Truth, lies, and the unexpected on the journey of motherhood. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woliver, L. R. (2002). The political geographies of pregnancy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana C. Parry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parry, D.C. Work, Leisure, and Support Groups: An Examination of the Ways Women with Infertility Respond to Pronatalist Ideology. Sex Roles 53, 337–346 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6757-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6757-0

Keywords

Navigation