Skip to main content
Log in

Sugarcane protoplasts: factors affecting division and plant regeneration

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sugarcane cell suspensions were initiated from leaf callus and sub-cultured every 7 to 10 days by alternate transfer to MS based medium with 3.0 and 1.0 mg 1−12,4-D. Suspensions older than 3 months gave the most reproducible yields of protoplasts. Isolated protoplasts required 50 mM Ca2+ in the washing solution and 100 mM Ca2+ in the culture medium to prevent lysis. At plating densities of 2.0–3.0×105 ml−1, 18% or more of the isolated protoplasts produced cell colonies when cultured in droplets or sectors of Kao and Michayluk (1975) based medium with 1.2% w/v Sea Plaque agarose. Cell colonies were of two morphological types. Those consisting of small, tightly packed cells developed into morphogenic callus. The latter produced an abundance of green meristems from which shoots and whole plants were regenerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

FDA:

fluorescein diacetate

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962)

References

  • Abdullah R, Cocking EC, Thompson JA (1986) Bio/Technology 4: 1087–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold S von, Eriksson T (1976) Physiol Plant 36: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WH (1978) M Phil Thesis, Univ of Leicester, UK.

  • Chen WH, Davey MR, Power JB, Cocking EC (1988) J Exp Bot 39: 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WH, Gartland KMA, Davey MR, Sotak R, Gartland JS, Mulligan BJ, Power JB, Cocking EC (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6: 299–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WH, Liu MC (1976) Natl Sci Council Monthly 4: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WH, Shih SC (1983) Proc ISST 18: 632–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly MY, Demarly Y (1986) Z Pflanzenzuchtg 96: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton SJ (1988) In: Puite KJ et al (eds) Progress in Plant Protoplast Research. Kluwer pp 49–50.

  • Davies ME (1972) Planta 104: 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura T, Sakurai M, Akagi H, Negishi T, Hirose A (1985) Plant Tissue Cult Lett 2: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frearson EM, Power JB, Cocking EC (1973) Dev Biol 33: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahlbrock K (1977) In: Barz W et al (eds) Plant Tissue Culture and its Bio-technological Application. Springer-Verlag, Berlin pp 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyser JW (1984) Z Pflanzenphysiol 113: 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia SR (1982) Can J Bot 60: 2192–2196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1977) Mol Gen Genet 150: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Gamborg OL, Michayluk MR, Keller WA, Miller RA (1973) Colloq Internatl CNRS 212: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1975) Planta 126: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur-Sawhney R, Adams WR, Tsong J, Galston AW (1977) Plant and Cell Physiol 18: 1309–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur-Sawhney R, Rancilloc M, Staskawiiz M, Adams WR, Galston AW (1976) Plant and Cell Physiol 18: 1309–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1976) Planta 128: 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1982) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult 1: 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lőrz H, Brettell RIS, Potrykus I (1981) Poster Section 12 XIII Internatl Bot Congr, Sydney, Australia.

  • Lőrz H, Larkin PJ, Thompson J, Scowcroft WR (1983) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cult 2: 217–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Vasil V, Vasil IK (1981) Z Pflanzenphysiol 104: 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racusen RH, Kinnersley AM, Galston AW (1977) Science 198: 405–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes CA, Lowe KS, Ruby KL (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabl H, Youngman RJ (1985) Plant Sci 40: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillito RD, Paszkowski J, Potrykus I (1983) Plant Cell Rep 2: 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan C, Vasil IK (1986) J Plant Physiol 126: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi Y, Komamine A (1982) Plant and Cell Physiol 23: 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JC, Katterman C (1984) Plant Sci Lett 36: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JA, Abdullah R, Cocking EC (1986) Plant Sci 47: 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK (1987) J Plant Physiol 128: 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Vasil IK (1980) Theor Appl Genet 56: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Wang D, Vasil IK (1983) Z Pflanzenphysiol 111: 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Vasil IK (1984) In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants Vol 1: Laboratory Procedures and their Applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y, Yang Z, Tang D (1986) Plant Cell Rep 5: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. Potrykus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W.H., Davey, M.R., Power, J.B. et al. Sugarcane protoplasts: factors affecting division and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 7, 344–347 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269934

Keywords

Navigation