Skip to main content
Log in

Permanent stenting in “unextractable” common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents

  • Controlled Prospective Clinical Trials
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for bile duct stones. Therefore, if ES and conventional stone extraction fail, further treatment is mandatory. Insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis is an effective option.

Materials and methods

We treated 30 high-risk patients (17 women and 13 men, mean age 82 years) affected by difficult common bile duct stones. The patients were randomly assigned preoperatively using closed envelopes (blind randomization) into two groups to receive insertion of polyethylene or hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stent, respectively. Follow-up was achieved by contacting referring physicians and patient’s relatives.

Results

Biliary drainage was established in all patients. Early minor complications occurred in 28%. In all these patients, the stent was a definitive measure. Median follow-up was 38 months. Late complications occurred in 34%. Cholangitis was the most frequent. During follow up, 11 patients died, two as result of a biliary-related cause. No statistically significant difference was observed on different stents patency.

Conclusion

Endoprosthesis insertion as a permanent therapy is an effective alternative to surgery or dissolution therapy. Therefore, biliary stenting should preferably be restricted to high-risk patients unfit for operative treatment and with a short life expectancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tazuma S (2006) Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(6):1075–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Palma GD, Catanzano C (1999) Stenting or surgery for treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi in elderly patients? Am J Surg 178:390–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman JJ, Rauws EAJ, Tijssen JGP, Tytgat GNJ, Huibregtse K (1995) Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 42:195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amplatz S, Piazzi L, Felder M, Comberlato M, Benvenuti S, Zancanella L, Di Fede F, de’Guelmi A, Bertozzo A, Farris P, Grasso T, Mega A, Chilovi F (2007) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis 39:267–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumgart LH (2007) Surgery of liver, biliary tract and pancreas, vol. 1, IV edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Choi SH (2007) Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1154–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maluenda F, Csendes A, Burdiles P, Diaz J (1989) Bacteriological study of choledochal bile in patients with common bile duct stones with or without acute suppurative cholangitis. Hepatogastroenterology 236:132–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsujinoa T, Sugitaa R, Yoshidaa H, Yagiokaa H, Kogurea H, Sasakia T, Nakaia Y, Sasahiraa N, Hiranoa K, Isayamaa H, Tadaa M, Kawabeb T, Omata M (2007) Risk factors for acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Misra SP, Dwiedi M (2008) Large-diameter balloon dilatation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 40:209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas M, Howell DA, Carr-Locke D, Mel Wilcox C, Chak A, Raijman I, Watkins JL, Schmalz MJ, Geenen JE, Catalano MF (2007) Mechanical lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary stones: complications and available treatment options collected. From expert centers. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1896–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Rotondano G, Cipolletta L, Ghezzo L, Foco A, Zambelli A (2000) Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 51:8–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes G (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson AG, Hosking SW (1987) Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 74:555–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saharia PC, Zuidema G, Cameron JL (1977) Primary common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 185(5):598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Madden JL (1973) Common duct stones; their origin and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 53:1095–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim DI, Kim MH, Lee SK et al (2001) Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 54:42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton PB (1995) Stents for stones: short-term good, long-term uncertain. Gastrointest Endoscopy 42(3):272–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Fujimura K, Ogura M, Kin H, Yamamoto S, Tsun K, Mizuno T, Inoue K (1994) Endoscopic endoprosthesis for large stones. Intern Med 33:597–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katsinelos P, Galanis I, Pilpilidis I, Paroutoglou G, Tsolkas P, Papaziogas B, Dimiropoulos S, Kamperis E, Katsiba D, Kalomenopoulou M, Papagiannis A (2003) The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones. Surg Endosc 17:1552–1555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Berkel AM, Boland C, Redekop WK, Bergman JJ, Groen AK, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K (1998) A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 30:681–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sung JJ, Chung SC, Tsui CP, Co AL, Li AK (1994) Omitting sideholes in biliary stents does not improve drainage of the obstructed biliary system: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 40:321–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Terruzzi V, Comin U, De Grazia F, Toti GL, Zambelli A, Beretta S (2000) Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc 51:23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. England RE, Martin DF, Morris J, Sheridan MB, Frost R, Freeman A et al (2000) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing 10F Teflon “Tannenbaum” stents with 10F polyethylene Cotton–Leung stents in patients with malignant common bile duct strictures. Gut 46:395–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schilling D, Rink G, Arnold JC, Benz C, Adamek HE, Jakobs R, Riemann JF (2003) Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing 3 different 10F plastic stents in malignant mid and distal bile duct strictures. Gastroint Endosc 58:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siegel JH, Yatto RP (1984) Biliary endoprostheses for the management of retained common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 79:50–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cotton PB, Forbes A, Leung JWC, Dineen L (1987) Endoscopic stenting for long-term treatment of large bile duct stones: 2- to 5-yearfollow up. Gastrointest Endosc 33:411–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cairns SR, Dias L, Cotton PB, Russel RC (1989) Additional endoscopic procedures instead of urgent surgery for retained common bile duct stones. Gut 30:535–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kill J, Kruse A, Rokkjaer M (1989) Large bile duct stones treated by endoscopic biliary drainage. Surgery 105:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  30. Soomers AJ, Nagengast FM, Yap SP (1990) Endoscopic placement of biliary endoprostheses in patients with endoscopically unextractable common bile duct stones. A long term follow up study of 26 patients. Endoscopy 22:24–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Sternbergen W, Pelemans W, Fevery J (1992) Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with large bile duct stones: longterm follow up. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peters R, Macmathuna P, Lombard M et al (1992) Management of common bile duct stones with a biliary endoprosthesis. Report on 40 cases. Gut 23:1412–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hui CK, Lai KC, Ng M et al (2003) Retained CBDS: a comparison between biliary stenting and complete clearance of stones by electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Palma GD, Galloro G, Siciliano S, Catanzaro C (2001) Endoscopic stenting for irretrievable common bile duct calculi. A long-term follow-up study of 49 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 48(37):56–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chan AC, Mg EK, Chung SC et al (1998) CBDS become smaller after endoscopic biliary stenting. Endoscopy 30(4):356–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sciumè C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Facella T, Li Volsi F, Modica G (2004) Prevention of clogging of biliary stents by administration of levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid. Chir Ital 56(6):831–837

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang S, Armstrong L, Lara LF, Kortan P (2007) De novo stent–stone complex after long-term biliary stent placement: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and endotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 66(1):193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girolamo Geraci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pisello, F., Geraci, G., Li Volsi, F. et al. Permanent stenting in “unextractable” common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393, 857–863 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1

Keywords

Navigation