Abstract
Purpose
The fetal development of the mandible is nowadays quite understood, and it is already known that craniofacial growth reaches its highest rate during the first 5 years of postnatal life. However, there are very few data focusing on the perinatal period. Thus, the present article is addressing this concern by studying the mandible morphology and its evolution around the birth with a morphometric method.
Methods
Thirty-one mandibles modelled in three dimensions from post-mortem CT-scans were analyzed. This sample was divided into two subgroups composed of, respectively, 15 fetuses (aged from 36 gestational weeks), and 16 infants (aged to 12 postnatal weeks). 17 distances, 3 angles, and 8 thicknesses were measured via the prior set of 14 landmarks, illustrating the whole mandible morphology.
Results
Although this methodology may depend on the image reconstruction quality, its reliability was demonstrated with low variability in the results. It highlighted two distinct growth patterns around birth: fetuses mandibles do not significantly evolve during the perinatal period, whereas, from the second postnatal weeks, most of the measurements increased in a homogeneous tendency and in correlation with age.
Conclusions
The protocol developed in this study highlighted the morphologic evolution of the mandible around birth, identifying a different growth pattern from 2 postnatal weeks, probably because of the progressive activation of masticatory muscles and tongue. However, considering the small sample size, these results should be thorough, so identification and management of anatomic abnormalities could eventually be achieved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buschang PH, Jacob H, Carrillo R (2013) The morphological characteristics, growth, and etiology of the hyperdivergent phenotype. Semin Orthod 19:212–226
Cohen MM (1999) Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability. Am J Med Genet 84:311–315
Eriksen J, Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Kreiborg S (2006) Early postnatal development of the mandible in children with isolated cleft palate and children with nonsyndromic robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:160–167
Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM (1992) Anthropometric growth study of the head. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:303–308
Hermann NV, Kreiborg S, Darvann TA et al (2003) Early craniofacial morphology and growth in children with nonsyndromic robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:131–143
Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Sundberg K et al (2010) Mandibular dimensions and growth in 11-to 26-week-old Danish fetuses studied by 3D ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 30:408–412
Hutchinson E (2010) An assessment of growth and sex from mandibles of cadaver foetuses and newborns. MSc thesis, University of Pretoria Academic Press
Hutchinson EF, L’Abbé EN, Oettlé AC (2012) An assessment of early mandibular growth. Forensic Sci Int 217:233.e1–233.e6
Hutchinson EF, Kieser JA, Kramer B (2014) Morphometric growth relationships of the immature human mandible and tongue. Eur J Oral Sci 122:181–189
Jones K (1997) Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformations, 5th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
Liu Y-P, Behrents RG, Buschang PH (2010) Mandibular growth, remodeling, and maturation during infancy and early childhood. Angle Orthod 80:97–105
Loth SR, Henneberg M (2001) Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol 115:179–186
Lowe AA, Takada K, Yamagata Y, Sakuda M (1985) Dentoskeletal and tongue soft-tissue correlates: a cephalometric analysis of rest position. Am J Orthod 88:333–341
Nicolaides K, Salvesen D, Snijders R, Gosden C (1993) Fetal facial defects - associated malformations and chromosomal-abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther 8:1–9
Oliveira FT de, Soares MQS, Sarmento VA et al (2014) Mandibular ramus length as an indicator of chronological age and sex. Int J Legal Med 129:195–201
Perera DMD, McGarrigle HHG, Lawrence DM, Lucas M (1987) Amniotic fluid testosterone and testosterone glucuronide levels in the determination of foetal sex. J Steroid Biochem 26:273–277
Radlanski RJ, Heikinheimo K, Gruda A (2013) Cephalometric assessment of human fetal head specimens. J Orofac Orthop-Fortschritte Kieferorthopadie 74:332–348
Reinisch JM, Ziemba-Davis M, Sanders SA (1991) Hormonal contributions to sexually dimorphic behavioral development in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:213–278
Sanz-Cortés M, Gomez O, Puerto B (2012) Chap. 70—micrognathia and retrognathia. In: Copel JA (ed) Obstetric imaging, 1st edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia
Scheuer L (2002) A blind test of mandibular morphology for sexing mandibles in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:189–191
Scott AR, Tibesar RJ, Lander TA et al (2011) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants younger than 3 months. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13:173–179
Smartt JM, Low DW, Bartlett SP (2005) The pediatric mandible: I. A primer on growth and development. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:14e–23e
Tracy WE, Savara BS (1966) Norms of size and annual increments of five anatomical measures of the mandible in girls from 3 to 16 years of age. Arch Oral Biol 11:587–598
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Berengere Saliba-Serre for her advices in the statistical analysis of our data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FR: protocol development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. YG: project development, data analysis, and manuscript editing. EV: project development and manuscript editing. GG: data collection and manuscript editing. PB: project development and manuscript editing. PA: project development and manuscript editing. LG: project development and manuscript editing. LT: project development, data analysis, and manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Remy, F., Godio-Raboutet, Y., Verna, E. et al. Characterization of the perinatal mandible growth pattern: preliminary results. Surg Radiol Anat 40, 667–679 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2030-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2030-4